No I am not grasping at straws I am ust saying you cannot say that there were not WMD's there, just like you can't say there weren't terrorists. There just wasn't the WMD's and terrorists we were after. Reply...

I did read most of what you posted....but.....I didn't stop there..
Thus I conclude that though they classified those remanants as WMD,s
You're still grasping at straws..
As far as Who KNows is concerned,
He made an absolutely incoherent statement...but that's typical of someone like him, who'se IQ doesn't reach room temperature..
Clinton attacked Saddam over WMDs..
How irrelevant can you get little man?
Nobody denies that he had bio weapns in the 80s, and used them too..so what's your point?
Propaganda?
Cheney had an entire government department dedicated to propaganda supporting his insane desire for war...
and people like you still cling to his lies...
Google Office of Special projects..
It won't de program you...nothing can do that....but you might learn something...though I doubt it. Reply...

Well maybe you should educate yourself on CWC then. It constitutes WMD's, just not the ones we went for. Did you read the OPCW report from this year that I posted? 

 

Reply...

Joe, Ye of little Faith...
Enjoy the week end....

Wave that flag
Wave it wide and high
Summertime done
Come and gone
My oh my


Guess where that came from Reply...

There was quite a stink raised when they found remanents of weapons, produced in the early 80s, containing traces of sarin and mustard gas, and got a Colonel (Chu) to say that these qualified as weapons of mass destruction, despite the fact that they were no longer effective...
but it's hard to believe that you'd base your claim that Saddam had wmds on this...
However, it's consistant with a claim made by someone who just cannot give up that claim...for reasons I've mentioned before... Reply...

http://smallwarsjournal.com/documents/ngicwmdreport.pdf

http://www.globalsecuritynewswire.org/gsn/nw_20090427_8248.php

"Iraq submitted its initial declaration on 12 March 2009, and has declared two bunkers with filled and unfilled chemical weapons munitions, some precursors, as well as five former chemical weapons production facilities,"

 

Reply...

So the DoD is lying? I never claimed AQ either, but there were terrorists inside Iraq, pal. Abu Ibrahim, he attacked a Pan-AM flight, his real name is Husayn al-Umari

http://www.cleveland.com/world/index.ssf/2009/04/finding_frankenstein_terrorist.html

Claiming Iraq had no terrorists pre-war is like saying, you have a million dollars simply because you say so.

I will rank you in with the rank in file 9/11 truthers then Rye, if you are sitting here telling me that the DoD is making up that they found chemical munitions.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/22/AR2006062201839.html

Which is basically a rehash of the first story which is directly from the DoD. They are covered under the Chemical Weapons Convention. While they themselves may have posed no threat to us there. They are still Chemical Weapons that are banned by the CWC. Which makes them WMD's 

Reply...

Here are several articles..debunking the WMD lie..many refer to that 03 incident you refer to...
but there's no sense trying to de program those who cling to the delusions propounded by the "Office of Special Projects", Cheney's government agency, tasked with creating a cult of obedience...
they did such a good job, that there remain several of the posters on this list. By now, they have too much of themselves tied up in these debunked propositions, and cannot cope with the reality that they're wrong.


http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7634313/

CIA's final report: No WMD found in Iraq - Conflict in Iraq- msnbc.com

Lacking Biolabs, Trailers Carried Case for War
On May 29, 2003, 50 days after the fall of Baghdad, President Bush proclaimed a ... He declared, "We have found the weapons of mass destruction. ... already concluded that the trailers had nothing to do with biological weapons. ... The trailers - - along with aluminum tubes acquired by Iraq for what was claimed to ...

Weapons of mass destruction in Iraq: Bush's “big lie” and the ...
The charge that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction was selected , as Deputy ... But no trace of a biological agent was found on the trucks, ... February 8, 2003—Bush said in his weekly radio address: “We have sources that tell ...

CNN.com - Official: U.S. calls off search for Iraqi WMDs - Jan 12 ...
Jan 12, 2005 ... Despite intensive searches, no banned Iraqi weapons were found after ... The U.S. ends its search for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. ... chemical and biological weapons, White House spokesman Scott McClellan said Wednesday. ... 2003 - - the month of the invasion - - Saddam did not have any WMD ...

FactCheck.org: Were there really weapons of mass destruction in ...
Feb 19, 2008 ... all of its existing stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons. ... After the invasion of Iraq in 2003, the Bush administration formed the ... there were no WMDs to be found; they called off the search in 2005. . Reply...

I understand that you people MUST cling to the notion that Saddam had WMDs and that he cooperated with AQ
While neither are true, you must continue to reject that reality, because if you accept it, your entire world crumbles... Reply...

What are you talking about rumors? They have found over 500 shells and they have had ied's that were used against our troops that were chemical shells.

http://www.defenselink.mil/news/newsarticle.aspx?id=15918

("These are chemical weapons as defined under the Chemical Weapons Convention, and yes ... they do constitute weapons of mass destruction," Army Col. John Chu told the House Armed Services Committee.

The Chemical Weapons Convention is an arms control agreement which outlaws the production, stockpiling and use of chemical weapons. It was signed in 1993 and entered into force in 1997.)

What part of that is unclear?

Reply...

Problem with claiming he didn't have WMD's is that he had stockpiled chemical weapons which are WMD's. They were burried in the desert just like his planes...

just another rumor..nobody ever proved it..or even introduced evidence of it..
those aluminum tubes had nothing to do with WMDs

who are you quoting, sean hannitty? Reply...

The end is near.

            

Reply...